Above is a new video I've just published entitled "Simon Shack, Tycho Brahe, Retrograde Mars & the vital importance of the Moon: Exploring the Tychos!" (link to the video here).
If someone told you that evidence suggests that the sun may not be the center of our solar system, and that while our earth is by no means stationary it is also possible that earth does not revolve around the sun, would you immediately reject that possibility and call them names because you are so convinced that the heliocentric model is correct that you will not entertain any challenges to that model?
What if you learned that the astronomer most famous for presenting the deciding arguments showing that the planetary data support the heliocentric model, Johannes Kepler, was in recent decades found to have falsified his data (data collected by the rigorous observations of his own mentor, who had died mysteriously), falsified in particular to try to force the heliocentric model to be able to absorb the data regarding the motions of the planet Mars, whose behavior is so difficult to explain that Kepler referred to his research on that planet as his "war on Mars" and who ominously declared that:
"By the study of the orbits of Mars, we must either arrive at the secrets of astronomy, or remain forever in ignorance of them"
-- would the knowledge that Kepler apparently deliberately falsified his data (which was discovered in 1988 by a professor of the history of astronomy) make you any more open to examining the evidence which suggests that Kepler's theory might not actually fit the facts that we see in the heavens above us?
This video does not support the flat earth theory, which I have examined a found to be hopelessly out of step with evidence that we can examine for ourselves (without even going into space) -- see for example my post from 2015 entitled "The invisible kraken: evidence that the earth is not flat."
Nor is this video making any arguments in support of the concept of "geocentrism," which continues to be maintained by some individuals to this day (often in conjunction with literalist interpretation of ancient scriptures).
Instead, this video explores some aspects of the important arguments of researcher Simon Shack, author of the "Tychos" model, which argues that the data and evidence we have available at this time may best be explained by the hypothesis that our sun is part of a binary system -- as in fact over 80% of the stars we can examine appear to be as well (or if not binary, then some other multiple and not solo, according to modern astronomy).
Simon's work, about which you can learn more at his website tychos.info, suggests that Tycho Brahe, under whom Kepler studied and worked as an assistant, formulated a more accurate model of the heavens, but that after Brahe's untimely death, Kepler "flipped it on its head" and instead argued for a heliocentric solar system, despite data which contradicted Kepler's assertions -- and that if we update Tycho's analysis to include some of what we've discovered about binary systems (as Simon Shack has now done), we can explain some evidence which poses serious problems for the heliocentric theory and which suggests that the heliocentric model may be gravely flawed and in need of radical revision.
This video cannot possibly explore all the evidence that Simon discusses: the interested viewer is also urged to check out Simon's 2018 book, entitled The Tychos: Our Geoaxial Binary System, which is available at that same website linked in the previous paragraph.
I myself am open to exploring all the evidence and have not "made up my mind" about the mechanics of our solar system. But I am keenly aware of other evidence which shows that we have been misled about a number of extremely important subjects, including aspects of humanity's ancient history -- and more recent history as well -- and it should be fairly obvious that the subject of the motions of the heavenly bodies and the cycles of the heavens is indeed of great interest to my own area of research regarding the suppression of humanity's ancient wisdom and the undeniable existence of a world-wide system linking the ancient myths and the stars.
